12 Angry Men

12 angry MenGrand canon University Introduction: In the movie 12 Angry Men an 18 year old son is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurymans see that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, pretermit for one, who opines that they owe the male child more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or non. The world who does not believe that the boy is guilty explains his views to the lie down of the jurors and is ridiculed by them. An old man afterward sees where he is firing with his reasoning and when the next right to vote is done, he also votes innocent. The jurors inhabit to discuss the case and realise up some valuable facts in favor of the teenager. Gradually, other jurors sire to change their minds, and the ones that do not become outraged. This musical theme germinate out break this movie in footing of how this group worked in contrive and the end making play, which emerged by answering nine put together out questions. What is the influence of relevant background factors on each jurors decision making process?

juror 1 was a bus and knew the true meaning of works together and in an great fashion. Juror 2 was a flocculent verbalize follower who could be swayed by the crowd. Juror 3 stood his ground with the guilty verdict until the end because of the tear descent with his own son. The fact that Juror 4 wore eyeglasses made him regard the womans testimony of perceive the boy stab his father as she was turning everyplace in bed. He knew people who soften eyeglasses do not wear them to bed. Juror 5 was minor mannered and kept his cool and was centripetal to the others thoughts and opinions and lessons they taught him. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.